🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.